Holding money for my sister… any downsides?

My sister will be inheriting around $100,000 and wants me to hold onto it for her since she struggles with addiction and doesn’t trust herself with the funds. Besides the potential stress of setting boundaries, can anyone think of other downsides?

Ideally, I’d put it somewhere low-risk with a bit of interest, so when she’s ready, she’d have a bit extra to help her get started. Whether that’s in 2 years or 5, I’m okay with waiting. Apologies if this sounds a bit naive— I’m not very experienced with investing.

Thanks for any advice.

A legal trust agreement could protect both of you. It would lay out how the money is managed. I’m not a lawyer, so I’d recommend consulting a trust lawyer. Just be aware there may be costs, especially since trust tax returns would need to be filed every year.

@Patton
I was about to say the same. Get a lawyer. Money can change people’s behavior.

@Patton
Power of attorney could be an option with signing authority. It can be set up so you both need to sign for any transactions.

I wouldn’t take on the complications of holding money for a family member with addiction issues. There are other options like trusteeship.

A simple option would be a 5-year GIC. It would keep the money inaccessible for 5 years, giving you a reason to not release it early.

Darren said:
A simple option would be a 5-year GIC. It would keep the money inaccessible for 5 years, giving you a reason to not release it early.

It’s better if she buys the GIC. If OP buys it, she might want the money mid-term, and OP could get into a dispute about penalties. A trust lawyer would be needed if OP manages it.

@Wilder
OP could end up needing to take out a loan against the GIC if she demands the money back early.

Darren said:
A simple option would be a 5-year GIC. It would keep the money inaccessible for 5 years, giving you a reason to not release it early.

A GIC ladder could work—maybe $20k each year for 1 to 5 years, so if she needs some funds sooner, part of it would be accessible.

Darren said:
A simple option would be a 5-year GIC. It would keep the money inaccessible for 5 years, giving you a reason to not release it early.

Honestly, if 5 years isn’t enough for her to be stable, what are the odds another year or two will be?

There’s a point where you may just need to give her the $100k with any interest and step away.

@Flor
Addiction is a lifelong vulnerability. It’s not about a set timeline but managing susceptibility. Recovery can’t be forced into a schedule.

Fin said:
@Flor
Addiction is a lifelong vulnerability. It’s not about a set timeline but managing susceptibility. Recovery can’t be forced into a schedule.

My point is that OP shouldn’t be burdened forever. If she isn’t ready after 5 years, then maybe it’s time for her to handle her own finances. Addiction is ultimately her challenge, and OP can’t be expected to hold the responsibility indefinitely.

Fin said:
@Flor
Addiction is a lifelong vulnerability. It’s not about a set timeline but managing susceptibility. Recovery can’t be forced into a schedule.

Not all addicts remain addicts forever. Recovery can mean no longer being actively addicted. For example, a former smoker is no longer addicted once the craving is gone. Addiction isn’t always a permanent state.

@Ailany
[deleted]

Hayley said:
@Ailany
[deleted]

Constantly identifying as an addict can be limiting. Approaches like SMART Recovery focus on changing behaviors rather than an unchangeable identity, which can encourage personal growth and break the cycle of dependency.

Darren said:
A simple option would be a 5-year GIC. It would keep the money inaccessible for 5 years, giving you a reason to not release it early.

Exactly :ok_hand:

This could end up really stressful for you.

I’d suggest making sure it’s all in her name, maybe in a GIC that’s locked for a certain period. That way, you’re not in a position to release funds early, which could avoid lots of conflict.

@Flor
Agree with this. She should set it up in her name, so you don’t have any responsibility if issues arise.

Jade said:
@Flor
Agree with this. She should set it up in her name, so you don’t have any responsibility if issues arise.

Yes, keeping it in her name also avoids taxes on any interest you earn.

@Kemper
Exactly. No extra expenses or liabilities for OP.